Indigenous Rights encompasses a variety of issues related to protecting cultural traditions, such as language, ceremonial practices and access to homelands. In the 19th century, and today, the fight for land rights was a critical part of the fight for Indigenous Rights. Centuries of predatory colonial and American practices had diminished the access of Wampanoag to their homelands to a fraction of the pre-contact territory. The remaining lands kept communally were at risk of exploitation by state appointed overseers and greedy neighbors—with resources like lumber and local crops regularly plundered. Wampanoag responded with petitions, physical protest, and demands for independence. Intermarriage brought individualistic philosophies into Wampanoag communities that also threatened traditional communal land practices, causing some tribes to enact policies protecting against attacks on their way of life.
When the colonists arrived, there were some 69 tribes with a multitude of villages across the Wampanoag Nation. Traditionally, Wampanoag practiced communal land management. Prior to colonization no individual plots existed—everyone lived in a village setting in the spring, fall, and winter. During part of the spring and summer, clans set up fish camps and gardens to prepare smoked foods for winter months, with the lands regulated by Clan Mothers. With the arrival of colonization, Wampanoag practices changed—plots were tended by specific families, while unclaimed lands were used for common purposes. Plots could be passed down within families, but when there was no heir, it returned to the communal pool.
By the 19th century, just a small fraction of these communities remained. The remaining lands kept communally were at risk of exploitation by state appointed overseers and greedy neighbors—with resources like lumber and local crops regularly plundered. The Wampanoag responded with petitions, physical protest, and demands for independence. Intermarriage brought individualistic philosophies into Wampanoag communities that also threatened traditional communal land practices, causing some tribes to enact policies protecting against attacks on their way of life.
The Wampanoag communal relationship with land was in stark contrast with the American belief that ownership and exploitation of land were key features of liberty and citizenship. Even the influential leader of the American Anti-Slavery Society, William Lloyd Garrison, came out against the Massachusetts policy that distinguished Mashpee, the largest Indigenous community in Massachusetts, as a communally owned district. He insisted that such a policy was paternalistic and deprived the Mashpee of their right to exercise the freedom to sell (profit from) their land. He likely considered this in line with his earlier support of Mashpee’s successful fight for independence. In reality, he showed his, and many Americans’, fundamental inability to grasp the cultural significance of communal land practices in favor of superimposing an individualistic and capitalistic framework. Mashpee was, eventually, illegally incorporated into the state of Massachusetts, and tribal members were forced to sell large swaths of land.